If you want a very good idea of what Twitterâs music app will look like, you should check out Casey Newtonâs detailed report at CNET.
Back? OK. Here are a few more details Iâve gleaned from people familiar with Twitterâs plans for the app:
- SoundCloud and iTunes wonât be the only third-party services integrating into the app. Twitter would like multiple companies to participate, and has signed on at least one: Music video service Vevo will display its clips on the app, using a Twitter-built player.
- Those Vevo videos are also likely to be the only way you can hear full songs from acts youâve heard of when you use the app. SoundCloud has the ability to play lots of music, but for the most part it canât play songs owned by the big music labels and publishers; Apple can only offer up partial clips of the songs in its music stores. And music-only services that do have licenses for complete songs, like Spotify, generally donât have the ability to play them on third-party apps.* So for now, at least, the emphasis on the app will be about sampling.
- While Twitter purchased music discovery startup We Are Hunted to design the app, this isnât like Vine, where Twitter bought an existing product and added it to its portfolio. This one has been spearheaded internally by Kevin Thau, Twitterâs first business development head. Thauâs Twitter profile no longer identifies his job at the company, and he no longer has a LinkedIn listing, either. But Iâm told heâs been running a sort-of-secret âskunkworksâ for Twitter for some time, and this project is either the result or part of it.
Now letâs zoom out and look at the big picture. Why exactly is Twitter building its own music app?
Perhaps because it agrees with Facebook: Thereâs a benefit in breaking up the feed.
Thatâs what Mark Zuckerberg and company did last week, when they offered users a chance to look at everything Facebook had to offer, or to slice it up into smaller streams. Now you can go the site and just look at your friendsâ pictures; or just check out what games theyâre playing, or just find out what music they like.
When the music app launches, Twitter will be offering its own take on the idea. Youâll still be able see what music your friends talk about on the main service. But if you want your music recommendations without Pope jokes, Google Reader obituaries or whatever else is fill up your stream, you can use the app.
The analogy isnât perfect, because the Twitter music app wonât just be what your friends care about, but what other people on Twitter are listening to as well. Thatâs where We Are Huntedâs design skills and discovery algorithms come in. But close enough.
Itâs possible that Twitter thinks the app may help it round up eyeballs it wasnât reaching before, but my gut is that if the app works, itâs simply going to segment Twitterâs existing audience into multiple containers.
Thatâs not necessarily a bad thing, businesswise. You can imagine all sorts of advertisers that would be interested in participating in a music-only app. Like Pepsi, which did a big music promotion with Twitter last summer.
And if that works with music, why not carve up the feed into other strips? Easy enough to imagine all sorts of takes on the idea â" either by medium (TV, movies, photos, etc) or topics (politics, sports, gossip).
Or maybe Twitter will be resistant to atomizing its audience, and will only want to do this a few different ways. It would be great to get some comment from Twitter itself, but theyâre profoundly uninterested in providing one. So for now, speculate away, and weâll come back when we have more.
*Note that when you want to hear a Spotify song via Facebook, for instance, you still have to open the Spotify client on your desktop before you can listen.
No comments:
Post a Comment